The submission for DigiWaters (FrostStone) presents significant red flags and indicates minimal to no verifiable traction. While the project describes a standard IT consulting firm established in 2014, the claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false and contradicts the reported 'marketcap' of 50,000 (which is exceptionally low for a 10-year-old company with 6 employees). The description is boilerplate copy-pasted from LinkedIn, and the input data lacks specific technical details or verifiable evidence of utility. The disparity between the grandiose audience claims and the low-quality submission data results in a score reflecting negligible proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline