The project addresses a legitimate B2B market need (M&A support) and claims a significant team size (30), which are positive signals. However, the submission contains severe credibility issues that heavily impact the score. Specifically, the traction claim 'most people have used my product' is objectively false for a niche platform, and audience reach defined as 'everyone' demonstrates a lack of market focus. Additionally, listing 'marketcap' in the monthly revenue field indicates a misunderstanding of key financial metrics. While the concept is sound, the lack of verifiable evidence and low-quality data entry results in a 'Minimal Traction' classification.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline