The project represents a legitimate academic initiative (Digital Health Lab at University College Roosevelt), but the submission is severely compromised by unrealistic and unverifiable claims. Specifically, the claim that 'most people have used my product' and an 'everyone' audience reach are factually incorrect for a regional research lab. Additionally, listing 'marketcap' for a research entity suggests a confusion of terms or lack of seriousness. While the underlying entity has real-world utility in a research context, the lack of verifiable traction and the poor quality of the submission data result in a low score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline