The submission for 'SwiftHeart' (Digital Creativity in Disability) presents a mix of verifiable historical success and low-quality, exaggerated submission data. While the entity 'Digital Creativity in Disability' (DCD) is a legitimate Liverpool-based firm with proven traction—specifically securing ~£1M in SBRI Healthcare funding for the 'WarnDry' sensor (2014-2016) and establishing the 'eHealth Cluster'—the submission itself contains red flags. Claims such as 'audience reach: everyone' and 'most people have used my product' are demonstrably false for a niche B2B/medical device developer. The project appears to be largely legacy or pilot-based (peak activity ~2015) rather than a currently scaling high-growth venture. The score reflects the genuine utility and past technical validation (SBRI Phase 2), heavily penalized for the lack of current verifiable traction, poor submission quality, and hyperbolic claims.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline