Digital Bark appears to be a legitimate but niche management consultancy focused on social housing technology. The submission suffers significantly from poor data quality, including hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product') and misused financial terminology ('marketcap' for revenue/valuation). While the core service has real-world utility for its specific sector, the lack of scalable technology, minimal verifiable traction, and low-quality response limit its Proof of Usefulness score to the 'Minimal Traction' tier.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline