Diakar Techniki Ltd.

The project represents a long-standing local entity (est. 1999) rather than a high-growth technology startup. The submission suffers from critically low quality, characterized by hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'), vague technical details ('Internet'), and ambiguous financial metrics. While the company likely provides valid local services, the lack of verifiable digital traction, the small team size (6), and the absence of clear innovation evidence result in a low score.