The submission appears to be a 'Frankenstein' entry, copying the description of a legitimate UK-based consultancy (DHT.health) but providing unrelated, crypto-native metrics (e.g., 'all time marketcap', 'GoldenFang'). The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a niche B2B rare disease research firm. The mismatch between the professional description and the low-quality, spam-like input data prevents verification of actual traction or utility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline