The project represents a legitimate educational institution (DHBW Lörrach) rather than a specific technology product. The submission suffers from extremely low quality, utilizing generic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience: everyone') which severely impact credibility. While the institution has verifiable regional traction and utility as a university (est. 1981, 350 team), the lack of technical innovation details and the 'spam-like' quality of the input data result in a score reflecting minimal valid technology project traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline