The submission for 'dGo-on' appears to be a low-effort or placeholder entry with no verifiable public footprint in the GovTech sector. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a project with no significant search presence or revenue data. The description is vague ('GovTech' vs 'B2B sales'), and the technologies listed ('business-development') are not technical components. As a result, the project scores near zero due to a complete lack of evidence, hyperbolic claims, and absence of verifiable utility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline