The submission references 'Dezineforce,' a company that appears to be defunct or historically inactive in this context. The claims provided—specifically that 'everyone' is the audience and 'most people have used my product'—are demonstrably false and undermine the credibility of the project. There is no concrete evidence of active users, revenue, or technical implementation. The submission lacks specific technical details, relying on generic tags. Consequently, the project receives a near-zero score due to a lack of verifiable utility, traction, and serious intent.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline