The submission describes an established consultancy (DevMynd, now Tandem) but provides extremely low-quality input data. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is factually incorrect for a B2B consultancy, and critical metrics (revenue, team size, active users) are missing or null. While the underlying business is legitimate, the submission itself fails to provide verifiable evidence of usefulness or traction according to the PoU methodology.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline