Proof of Usefulness Report

Designater

Analysis completed on 1/19/2026

-9
Proof of Usefulness Score
Lab Mode

The submission for 'Designater' contains significant contradictions and unverifiable claims. While described as 'Construction Tech', the business type is listed as 'Design & Branding' with no relevant technology stack. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a project with no online footprint, traction metrics, or team information. The submission appears to be a placeholder or low-quality test data, triggering red-flag penalties for credibility.

Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?

Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes

View All Reports

Score Breakdown

Real World Utility+1
Audience Reach Impact+0
Technical Innovation+0
Evidence Of Traction-10
Market Timing Relevance+0
Functional Completeness+0
Subtotal-8
Usefulness Multiplierx1.08
Final Score-9

Project Details

Project URL
Description
Designateris in the Construction Tech Industry
Audience Reach
everyone
Target Users
everyone
Technologies
Marketing, Design, Creative Agency
Traction Evidence
most people have used my product

Algorithm Insights

Market Position
Early stage requiring focused development
User Engagement
Documented reach suggests active user community
Technical Stack
Modern tech stack aligned with sponsor technologies

Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score

Document User Growth

Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates

Showcase Revenue Model

Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams

Expand Evidence Base

Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation

Technical Roadmap

Share development milestones and feature completion timeline