The submission describes a niche consulting service rather than a scalable technology project. The score is significantly impacted by exaggerated and unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'everyone' as audience). While the business appears to be a legitimate service agency with a team of 6, the lack of technical innovation, ambiguous revenue metrics ('marketcap' used incorrectly), and poor response quality result in a low Proof of Usefulness score relative to high-growth tech ventures.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline