The submission for Deedar Technologies presents significant red flags, primarily the demonstrably false claim that 'most people have used my product' without providing any verifiable metrics, revenue, or active user data. The project appears to be a standard digital services agency (web design, marketing) rather than a high-growth technology product. The response quality is extremely low, with hyperbolic descriptions ('transcending conventional boundaries') and a lack of specific evidence. Consequently, the project scores very low on traction, innovation, and reach.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline