The submission for 'DeBridges' appears to be a low-quality entry referencing a project that likely rebranded to 'Chainspot.io' or is confusingly similar to the legitimate 'deBridge.finance'. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false and significantly undermines credibility. While the underlying concept of a bridge aggregator has utility, the submission fails to provide verifiable evidence of traction, uses an outdated or squatting domain, and lists irrelevant technologies like 'construction'. The specific market cap figure cited likely belongs to a different entity or is unsubstantiated for this specific URL.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline