The submission presents a discrepancy between a professional-sounding corporate description and highly unprofessional, inaccurate form responses. While the project describes valid cybersecurity consulting services, claims such as 'most people have used my product' and an audience of 'everyone' effectively nullify credibility. The term 'marketcap' used for revenue further suggests confusion or a lack of seriousness. Without verifiable evidence to support the global hub claims or the $500k figure, the project scores in the lowest tier.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline