The submission suffers from extremely vague and hyperbolic claims, most notably the assertion that 'most people have used my product' without supporting evidence. The project is described as a generic IT services provider with no specific technological differentiation listed. The audience is defined simply as 'everyone,' and the financial metrics ('marketcap: 2500000') lack currency or verification context. Due to low response quality and lack of verifiable traction signals, the score is minimal.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline