The submission presents significant contradictions, notably the discrepancy between the project name 'Databerry Systems' (a B2B engineering consultancy) and the name 'AncientKeeper' (which sounds like a game or unrelated product). While the description text outlines a professional engineering firm established in 1987, the input data—such as 'all time marketcap: 500000', audience reach claimed as 'everyone', and evidence of traction stated as 'most people have used my product'—appears highly exaggerated, inaccurate, or possibly hallucinated. The email address format suggests a student or internal ID. The lack of verifiable metrics and the confusing nature of the submission result in a low score, despite the potential legitimacy of the underlying business description.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline