The submission represents a legitimate service-based small business (CAGE 9HAJ2), likely a government contractor, rather than a scalable technology project. The evaluation is heavily penalized for hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience 'everyone'). There is no evidence of software traction, user base, or revenue metrics relevant to a tech evaluation. The response quality is low, lacking the specific details required for a higher Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline