The submission for 'Data Excavator' appears to be a legitimate software tool marred by a low-quality, template-based submission. Search results confirm the tool exists and is listed on software comparison sites like Crozdesk, described as a multi-threaded C# scraping server. However, the submission contains critical credibility flags: the traction claim ('most people have used my product') and financial metric ('all time marketcap: 2500000') match a known pattern of spam/bot submissions found across unrelated projects (e.g., Wolfpack Financial, Reborn Marketing). The claims are demonstrably false (audience is niche, not 'everyone'), and the domain appears inactive or redirects to listings. The score is severely penalized for false traction data and poor response quality, despite the underlying software likely having some historical utility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline