The project represents a legitimate boutique data consulting firm (Data Collective Canada), but the submission quality is critically low. The user uses a pseudonym ('ShadowFang') and makes demonstrably false traction claims ('most people have used my product') for a niche B2B service. While the underlying business services (data strategy, literacy) have real-world utility, the hyperbolic claims, misuse of financial terminology ('marketcap'), and lack of specific evidence result in a very low score, penalizing the submission for unreliability.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline