The submission appears to be for 'Dapper', a legitimate B2B growth marketing agency in Rotterdam, despite the project name 'StarStorm' and low-quality input data. While the agency is a verified business with approximately 20 employees and real client cases, it scores low on the Proof of Usefulness scale because it is a service business rather than a technology product. The submission contained significant errors (e.g., claiming 'most people have used my product' and 'everyone' as the audience), which heavily penalized the Response Quality and Traction Evidence scores. The project relies on third-party tools (HubSpot, Google Ads) rather than proprietary technical innovation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline