The submission suffers from significant credibility issues, notably the demonstrably false claim that 'most people have used my product' and the confusion of 'marketcap' with revenue. While the underlying concept (health screening) has utility, the project appears to be a standard service provider with no evidence of unique technical innovation or verifiable traction. The response quality is low, suggesting a lack of seriousness or a test submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline