The submission contains significant red flags, most notably the exaggerated and unverifiable claim that 'most people have used my product' for a niche enterprise encrypted search tool. While the problem statement (encrypted search) addresses a valid utility, the description appears to be dated boilerplate text (circa 2015) with no current evidence of active operations, revenue, or market presence. The claim of 'everyone' as the target audience contradicts the 'hyper-scale enterprise' focus. The lack of verifiable traction and the low-effort quality of the submission result in a score reflecting minimal proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline