The submission for CyberNIQ presents significant credibility issues. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is objectively false for a 2024 Perth-based consultancy and indicates either a lack of seriousness or a hallucinated input. The term 'marketcap' is misused in place of revenue or valuation, and the figure ($2.5M) is unverifiable. Furthermore, search queries yield no digital footprint for 'CyberNIQ' in Australia, contradicting the claim of a 30-person team. The project scores very low due to lack of verifiable evidence, poor response quality, and exaggerated traction claims.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline