The submission for Cyanodoc Healthcare suffers significantly from low-quality data and hyperbolic claims. While the project appears to address a valid health concern (thyroid diagnosis) and claims a team size of 11-50 since 2017, the assertion that 'most people have used my product' is unverifiable and detracts from credibility. The lack of specific revenue data, generic audience targeting ('everyone'), and generic technology tags result in a low score, reflecting either a lack of serious engagement with the evaluation process or a project with minimal verifiable traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline