The project appears to be a generic freelancer or agency portfolio with significant inconsistencies in the submission data (conflicting names 'SwiftKeeper' vs 'Curious Fjord'). The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false and heavily penalizes the traction score. With a launch date of 2016 and no indexed web presence or verifiable metrics, the project demonstrates minimal real-world footprint. The 'marketcap' revenue figure is contextually irrelevant for a service business, suggesting a low-quality or spam submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline