The submission represents a legitimate alumni association (CUNEF Alumni) but suffers critically from low-quality, inaccurate, and spam-like data entry. Claims such as 'most people have used my product' and 'everyone' for audience reach are objectively false. The 'market cap' revenue figure is nonsensical for a non-profit association. While the underlying organization exists and has utility for its niche (approx. 3,000 alumni), the submission fails to demonstrate technological innovation or serious project validation metrics required for a high PoU score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline