The submission for 'cuby' outlines a B2B SaaS Property Management System with a focus on community. However, the project's credibility is severely undermined by verifiable red flags in the submission data. The claim of '51-200' employees contradicts the lack of digital footprint and the unprofessional responses (e.g., claiming 'most people have used my product' for traction and 'everyone' for audience). The revenue field contains null data, and the description drifts between construction tech and SaaS. While the underlying concept of a community-centric PMS is valid, the lack of serious evidence, potential factual inaccuracies, and low-quality submission responses result in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline