The project submission identifies as 'WhisperWing' but links to 'cube.dev', which is Cube, a well-established, Series B funded, open-source semantic layer. While the underlying technology is of exceptional utility, innovation, and market relevance (verified via the URL and external knowledge), the submission content itself is of extremely low quality, containing incorrect naming and hyperbolic, unverifiable claims (e.g., 'everyone', 'most people have used my product'). The score is heavily buoyed by the verifiable success of the actual Cube Dev platform (16k+ GitHub stars, widely used in data engineering) but significantly penalized for the poor quality and inaccuracy of the specific form responses.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline