The project submission contains critically low-quality data and hyperbolic claims that undermine credibility (e.g., claiming 'most people have used my product' and listing 'space-technology' without context). While the concept of Web3 APIs is relevant, the lack of verifiable evidence, the 'everyone' audience definition, and the unprofessional response quality result in a minimal score. The project appears to be in a conceptual stage or is a test submission with no verifiable market traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline