The submission describes a legitimate-sounding defense technology company (Crosshill Ltd) with high-utility hardware security offerings. However, the data provided contains significant contradictions and red flags. Claims such as audience reach being 'everyone' and 'most people have used my product' directly contradict the niche nature of high-security defense electronics. The revenue metric ('all time marketcap: 2500000') is terminologically confused. While the team size (30) and longevity (2014) suggest real-world stability, the poor quality of the submission and hyperbolic claims severely impact the Proof of Usefulness score, categorizing it as a submission with minimal verified traction/validity.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline