The submission describes a legitimate charitable entity (Croda Foundation) backed by a FTSE 100 company, which provides significant real-world utility potential. However, the submission itself scores poorly as a technology project evaluation due to verifiable falsehoods in the user data ('most people have used my product'), a lack of technological innovation (standard non-profit management), and low-quality response metrics. While the organization is real and funded (~£2.5M), the entry fails to demonstrate the specific utility of a technology solution and relies on exaggerated reach claims.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline