The submission for 'Cratic' lacks verifiable evidence of its claims. The description is a generic consulting pitch in Spanish, while the provided URL (cratic.ai) appears to have no indexed web presence or search footprint. Claims such as 'everyone' for audience reach and 'most people have used my product' for traction are hyperbolic and unsubstantiated, contradicting the lack of online visibility. The 'marketcap' figure is ambiguous, and the email format suggests a possible academic or test environment rather than an established commercial entity. The project receives a minimal score due to lack of proof, vague utility, and unverifiable traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline