The project represents Core-Mark, a massive, established Fortune 500-scale distributor (founded 1888) with verifiable verifiable traction and significant real-world utility. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing vague claims ('everyone', 'most people') and a suspicious submitter name ('IronForge') that contradicts the project identity. While the entity's intrinsic value is high, the Proof of Usefulness is severely impacted by the lack of effort and evidence in the submission, resulting in a score comparable to a mid-sized tech entity rather than a corporate giant.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline