The submission contains critical inconsistencies, describing the project as a 'Student Union App' while listing the business type as a 'virtual care platform'. The traction claim ('most people have used my product') is demonstrably false and hyperbolic for an unverified project. With no active user data, revenue, or team details, and a generic technical description, the project shows no verifiable proof of usefulness or market viability.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline