The submission for 'Coopers & Cole' presents significant contradictions and red flags. While the description outlines a niche B2B consultancy (utility theft, hydrocarbon intelligence), the audience reach ('everyone') and traction claims ('most people have used my product') are objectively false and resemble spam. A search for the domain 'coopersandcole.com.au' yields no results, casting doubt on the existence of the claimed 30-person team and 2015 launch. The misuse of financial terms ('marketcap' for revenue) further degrades credibility. The project scores near zero due to lack of verifiable footprint and poor submission quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline