The submission for CoolSnail Technologies presents significant credibility issues. While the description outlines standard IT consulting services, the inputs contain hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., audience reach defined as 'everyone' and traction claimed as 'most people have used my product'). The revenue metric is confused ('all time marketcap: 50000'), and the lack of specific technological details suggests a generic or low-effort entry. The project lacks verifiable evidence of utility, innovation, or market impact required for a higher score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline