The project represents a legitimate B2B sales enablement platform founded in 2016, but the submission itself is of critically low quality. The claims regarding audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product') are demonstrably false and hyperbolic for a niche enterprise tool. While the underlying product has real-world utility and a verifiable history, the lack of credible evidence, absence of technical details, and nonsensical metrics in the submission result in a failed Proof of Usefulness evaluation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline