The submission represents 'Consumer Attorneys PLC', a verified and highly successful consumer protection law firm with estimated recoveries exceeding $100M and a national presence. However, the submission itself is of extremely poor quality (pseudonymous submitter, false claims like 'most people have used my product', and missing data). While the underlying business is robust and financially significant (scoring higher than the reference calibration), the project receives minimal points for Technical Innovation as it is a service business, and is heavily penalized in Response Quality. The score reflects a strong Real-World Utility and validated Traction, balanced against the lack of proprietary technology and the low-effort submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline