Construction Mastery appears to be a legitimate niche educational and productivity 'operating system' for Quantity Surveyors, despite a low-quality submission. The project addresses a clear professional pain point (modernizing QS workflows). However, the submission contains significant red flags: claiming the audience is 'everyone' (when it is clearly niche), hyperbolic traction claims ('most people have used my product'), and ambiguous financial data ('marketcap: 500000'). While the external digital footprint suggests a functional info-product business, the lack of verifiable user data and the poor quality of the application heavily penalize the score, placing it in the 'Minimal Traction' tier.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline