Consard Limited appears to be a legitimate, established (2003) management consultancy in the health sector, not a technology product. The submission suffers significantly from exaggerated and unverifiable claims, such as an audience reach of 'everyone' and traction described as 'most people have used my product,' which is factually impossible for a specialized B2B consultancy. The revenue metric is confused ('all time marketcap'), and the project lacks technical innovation as it is a service business. The low score reflects the mismatch between the submission's claims and the reality of a niche service firm, as well as the lack of scalable technology.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline