The project represents 'CoinDesk', a premier digital asset media and data provider with immense industry utility and reach. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, featuring hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'), nonsensical financial data ('all time marketcap: 2500000'), and generic technical descriptions. While the entity itself is a market leader (validating high base scores for Utility, Reach, and Traction), the score is significantly dampened by the poor evidence quality and lack of specific, verifiable details in the application.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline