The project represents a legitimate Finnish consulting firm (CoHumans) specializing in organizational ethics and social sustainability, verified via external search. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and lacking technical details. The project is a service business (Management Consulting) rather than a technology product. While the underlying business is real and socially useful, the PoU score is heavily penalized for the non-technical nature of the submission and the lack of credible traction evidence in the input data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline