The project 'DeepKeeper' appears to be a mislabeled submission for 'Cohezia', a UK-based venture builder established in 1997. The submission contains significant discrepancies, including a claimed team size of 125 that is unsubstantiated by external data, and a demonstrably false traction claim that 'most people have used my product'. While Cohezia is a legitimate, long-running consultancy/venture studio, the submission relies on buzzwords (IoT, AI, 3D Printing) without evidence of proprietary technology or specific product traction. The revenue figure is vague ('marketcap 2500000'), and the reach claim ('everyone') is unrealistic for a B2B service provider. The low score reflects the lack of verifiable high-growth traction, the poor quality of the submission, and the generic nature of the offering relative to the 'exponential' claims.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline