The project appears to be a legitimate coaching consultancy for performance and burnout, but the submission is heavily penalized for hyperbolic and verifiable false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience is 'everyone'). It lacks technical innovation and provides confusing financial metrics ('all time marketcap'). While the underlying service has utility, the submission fails to demonstrate significant reach or verifiable traction comparable to the calibration benchmarks.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline