The submission for 'Cognita Plus' references a standard Moodle portal, likely for the Cognita school network, but the input data contains significant red flags. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is factually incorrect, and the 'Farming' technology tag is irrelevant to an LMS. The revenue field confuses 'marketcap' with revenue, suggesting a low-quality or spam submission. While the underlying URL may have utility for a specific student base, the submission provides no verifiable evidence of ownership, innovation, or scale to warrant a meaningful score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline