The submission for CoffeeBeans presents significant red flags regarding data quality and credibility. While the claimed team size (89-335) suggests an established mid-sized organization, the evidence of traction ('most people have used my product') is hyperbolic and unverifiable. The target audience ('everyone') is unrealistically broad for a B2B analytics/consultancy firm. The lack of concrete revenue data and the generic description result in a low score, as the submission fails to substantiate the project's utility or market position.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline