The submission references a high-profile platform (CodeChef) but provides extremely low-quality evidence. The description describes a 'Chapter' (likely a student group) rather than the main platform, yet claims the parent company's team size. The traction claim 'most people have used my product' is hyperbolic and unverifiable. The submission fails to substantiate the project's utility or reach within the context of this specific application.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline