The submission lacks verifiable data and contains hyperbolic, unsubstantiated claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'). The domain appears inactive or has no significant digital footprint despite a claimed 2011 launch. The target audience description ('everyone') contradicts the stated business type ('solutions for cultural institutions'). This project scores in the lowest tier due to a lack of evidence, poor response quality, and absence of verifiable traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline